My husband and I are taking care of his very elderly, frail, 95 year old who is completely dependent on our care, and has been for a year now. Needs 100% assistance getting into bed and out of it, along with getting off the couch, and back on. Walks with a walker for short distances, needs to be in a wheelchair for long distances. She's had physical therapy three times now and there was no progress made in regards to her being able to at least get off the couch on her own to go to the bathroom. Her Dr says its a good thing for her because it will give her a sense of "accomplishing something" when nothing of the sort has happened in the past. She's come home from therapy each time in pain, and at times cant even move as a result of the pain. Even if she was able to move around on her own again it would be too dangerous. Is her Dr crazy for thinking this is good thing to do even though it will accomplish nothing?
I'm surprised the PT clinic will continue with her when she is not showing progress.
Don't get me wrong. I think PT is very beneficial in many circumstances. I've just gone through a course of PT myself. My husband (86, dementia) just completed several months of PT intended to strengthen his legs to help prevent falls. So I certainly think there is a time and place for physical therapy! But in the situation you describe? Ya, that is pretty crazy.
The week my father died, the hospital was doing PT and OT on him. I couldn't figure out why. It is almost a knee-jerk way with healthcare now. I knew he was going to die. They knew it. So why? The insurance company told them no to further rehab because it wouldn't do him any good. I agreed completely, particularly because he died that day.
Sometimes I hear people worry about losing their "quality" healthcare in the USA. They must have better doctors than I've seen.
My mom had a stroke in therapy too...but I don't think it was the therapy that caused it. Several times she maxed out with no progress because she often didn't want to make the effort though she said she wanted to acheive the goal, once she got no therapy because someone wrote down that she was "total care" at baseline and that wasn't true, and once they just flat out used up her hundred days and then quit, though she was still improving some; at that point they admitted some of the goals we had were not acheivable but right up to day 100 they never came out and said so. I wish everybody cared about the patient first, second, third, and fourth, and maximizing profits was a priority wasy down the line somewhere after first doing no harm and making sure you helped as much as you could...